“Clearly, the dedication we’ve demonstrated for the last several decades for precision and sequence of causation [in classifying deaths] was being thrown out the window, and the question was Why?”
Scott Jensen, MD (Interview)
DEATH CERTIFICATE FRAUD
This story starts with Minnesota state senator and family doctor Scott Jensen.
On April 3rd, 2020, Dr. Jensen received an email from the Minnesota Department of Health. This email stated that it was okay to diagnose a death as COVID-19 even if he wasn’t sure or hadn’t done any testing to confirm a diagnosis. The email went on to say that if COVID was thought to be a contributing condition, the death could be listed as a COVID-caused death.
On March 24th, the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS), under the direction of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and National Institute of Health (NIH), instructed physicians, medical examiners, and coroners to utilize a new classification methodology for COVID-19 cases in the bulletin National Vital Statistics System COVID-19 Alert No. 2, March 24, 2020.
Key quotes from this document:
“the rules for coding and selection of the underlying cause of death are expected to result in COVID-19 being the underlying cause more often than not.““If the death certificate reports terms such as “probable COVID-19” or “likely COVID-19,” these terms would be assigned the new ICD code. It Is not likely that [National Center for Health Statistics] NCHS will follow up on these cases.“
“COVID-19 should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death.”
“If the decedent had other chronic conditions such as COPD or asthma that may have also contributed, these conditions can be reported in Part II.”
What this is saying is that a death certifier can assume a COVID-19 death without any sort of verification and that death certificates will not be audited for accuracy.
Dr. Jensen followed a link in the email to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to read the 7 page, Guidance for Certifying Deaths Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19).
This document instructed death certifiers to:
Record COVID-19 as the cause of death listed in Part I of the death certificate, even in assumed cases. It also instructed that COVID-19 be recorded as the primary cause of death even if the decedent had other chronic comorbidities. All comorbidities for COVID-19 would now be listed in Part II, rather than in Part I as they had been since 2003 for all other causes of death. For a critical examination of this document, see: If COVID Fatalities Were 90.2% Lower, How Would You Feel About Schools Reopening?
“It was clear to me very quickly that we were basically being coached to use COVID-19 as the cause of death.”
Dr. Scott Jensen (Source: Interview)
The instructions de-emphasized comorbities and made COVID-19 the default cause of death. These special instructions exclusive to COVID-19 skewed death certificate results, effectively reclassifying many deaths from a variety of causes, now classified as COVID-19 deaths.
“Dr. Debra Birx in April made the announcement that contrary to how other countries are doing it it, the CDC is going to count died with COVID-19 as died from, no matter what they actually died from. A blanket determination of death… If you had a positive test when you died, you died from COVID.”
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler (Source: Webinar)
From here Dr. Jensen was involved in a series of radio, television and internet interviews where the new guidelines for filling out death certificates specific to COVID-19 were discussed. (Source) For this exposure of the CDC, Dr. Scott Jensen was targeted by the medical establishment. (Source)
Must See Interview with Dr. Scott Jensen
“If you want to paralyze people’s own ability to think for themselves and stand up for themselves: Frighten them. Scare them so bad they can’t think straight. They’re paralyzed. That’s one way to control large groups of people.”
Dr. Scott Jensen (from Video Interview Above)
Financial Incentives to Falsify Hospital Admissions
“Anytime healthcare intersects with dollars, it gets awkward. Right now, Medicare has determined that if you have a COVID-19 admission to the hospital you’ll get paid $13,000 dollars. If that COVID-19 patient goes on a ventilator, you get $39,000… Nobody can tell me after 35 years in the world of medicine that sometimes those kinds of things have an impact on what we do.” — Dr. Scott Jensen (Source)
Oddly, the use of ventilators can result in trauma to the lungs and may be responsible for causing deaths, as attested to by Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell, an ICU doctor from New York. Indeed, studies from Germany and Philadelphia point to mechanical ventilation as a significant risk factor for death among hospitalized COVID-19 patients. It seems strange to financially incentivize a medical procedure that may actually increase the likelihood of death.
“The CARES Act [financial] distributions were done on different formulas. The first distributions were based on previous formulas used in 2019 and 2018. The high impact distribution was based on, if you as a hospital could reach 161 admissions with COVID-19, then you received–in addition to what you’ve already been paid–$77,000 per admission. Which for many of these hospitals would be 25-30 million dollars. Then there was another high impact distribution a little later on, whereby if you could reach 100 COVID-19 admissions then you could receive $50,000 per admission.” — Dr. Scott Jensen (Source)
The claim of financial incentives for falsified death certificates was confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Robert Redfield in a July 31, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing. (Source 1) (Source 2)
As a result of these perverse incentives and the new rules for death certificates: gunshot fatalities, poisoning or a motorcycle crash might be counted as COVID-19 deaths.
Because of such blatant and widespread falsification, memes like this have been circulating:
“They’re people that have committed suicide and the cause of death was ‘COVID-19’. Suicide!!! Who would have known that the number 1 and the number 2 leading cause of deaths in the industrialized world, cancer and heart disease, that the solution for those two disease processes was COVID. Because nobody’s dying of cancer and heart disease anymore. It’s all ‘COVID’.”
Dr. Rashid Buttar, (Source: Vaccines Revealed, Episode 7)
Dr. Scott Jensen’s claims caught the attention of Dr. Henry Ealy. Dr. Ealy’s COVID Research Team team of doctors, scientists, and lawyers had been researching COVID-19 data. They confirmed Dr. Scott Jensen’s claims regarding the reclassification of deaths in this must read peer-reviewed paper: COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective
Some key points from the paper:
All federal agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), are lawfully required to comply with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and the Information Quality Act (IQA). Data being collected, analyzed, and published by any federal agency is required to meet the highest standards for accuracy, quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity as defined by the PRA, IQA, as well as additional guidelines issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
The key to initiating legal regulatory oversight of all proposed changes to data collection, publication, and analysis is the Federal Register. Each Federal agency is required to submit a formal change proposal to the Federal Register before enacting their proposed changes. By submitting a change proposal to the Federal Register, federal agencies open the minimum 60-day public comment and peer-review process. Additionally, it is the “change proposal submission” to the Federal Register that alerts the OMB that legal oversight of the process has been initiated. Federal agencies that make changes to how they collect, publish, and analyze data without alerting the Federal Register and OMB, as a result, are in violation of federal law.
The CDC published guidelines on March 24, 2020 that substantially altered how cause of death is recorded exclusively for COVID-19. This change was enacted apparently without public opportunity for comment or peer-review. As a result, a capricious alteration to data collection has compromised the accuracy, quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of their published data, leading to a significant increase in COVID-19 fatalities (statistically speaking). This decision by the CDC may have subverted the legal oversight of the OMB as Congressionally authorized by the PRA & IQA as well…
Emphasizing that COVID-19 be specifically placed in Part I of the death certificate while any comorbidities be listed in Part II is genuinely concerning. Changing reporting rules exclusively for COVID-19 cause of death reporting without notifying the Federal Register, OMB, OIRA, or the public, and therefore potentially breaching the PRA & IQA, is even more concerning.
It’s worth noting that Part I of a death certificate is the immediate cause of death listed in sequential order from the official cause on line item (a) to the underlying causes that contributed to death in descending order of importance on line item (d), while Part II is/are the significant conditions NOT relating to the underlying cause(s) in Part I. Comorbid conditions have been listed on Part I of death certificates as causes of death per the CDC Handbook since 2003 to ensure accurate reporting can be developed. Comorbidities are seldom placed in Part II. Part II is typically the section where coroners and medical examiners can list recent infections as underlying, initiating factors.
Prior to the CDC’s March 24th decision, any comorbidities would have been listed in Part I rather than Part II and initiating factors such as infections including the SARS-COV-2 virus, would have been listed on the last line in Part I or more commonly in Part II.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on February 28, 2021, “For 6% of these deaths, COVID-19 was the only cause mentioned on the death certificate. For deaths with conditions or causes in addition to COVID-19, on average, there were 3.8 additional conditions or causes per death.”
(Source: CDC)
This quote implies that 94% of people classified as “COVID deaths” had an average of nearly 4 comorbidities–meaning they were very sick and dying from multiple causes. That makes 94% of deaths attributed to COVID-19, from the outset, highly questionable.
“Why would the CDC decide against using a system of data collection & reporting they authored, and which has been in use nationwide for 17 years without incident, in favor of an untested & unproven system exclusively for COVID-19 without discussion and peer-review? Did the CDC’s decision to abandon a known and proven effective system also breach several federal laws that ensure data accuracy and integrity? Did the CDC knowingly alter rules for reporting cause of death in the presence of comorbidity exclusively for COVID-19? If so, why?”
“If the fatality data being presented by the CDC is illegally inflated, then all public health policies based upon them would be immediately null and void.”
(Source: COVID-19 Data Collection, Comorbidity & Federal Law: A Historical Retrospective)
This paper from Dr. Henry Ealy’s team has been used as key evidence in numerous lawsuits in the US. It has also served as the basis for the Beckman Vs. HHS federal case against the Human Health Services and CDC. You can see the press release here.
One would think that a federal case charging the Human Health Services and the CDC with death certificate fraud would be a bombshell of a news story. But a cursory search of the web reveals a total blackout in the mainstream media. My sense is that this is not an accident.
A series of round table discussions about Dr. Henry Ealy’s paper, Ana Garner’s legal case and the CDC’s role in falsifying death certificates can be viewed here:
Data Disaster: A call for an Investigation Into the CDC’s Conduct During COVID-19
To get a sense of what all this means. The correction of death counts is anticipated to be significant but may be a large as the graphic below:
Graph Source: COVID-19: Restoring Public Trust During A Global Health Crisis
Without even getting into the PCR testing fraud (the “test” used to confirm COVID cases, a topic that is a whole other can of worms), the chart shows that the death rates from COVID may have been exaggerated greater than 16(x) times the actual amount, just based on death certificate fraud alone.
To put this in perspective: we have an actual amount of possible COVID deaths, probably a small fraction of the ~300,000 claimed, possibly as low as ~18,785 deaths. And examining the problems with the PCR testing fraud (see the next blog post), even this remaining number is questionable.
Each year more than 480,000 people in the US die from cigarettes (Source). Look at that number compared to the alleged COVID deaths. If our priority was to save lives, we could save a lot more people by banning the manufacture and sale of cigarettes, without all of the collateral damage of destroying people’s lives with lockdowns. But we should be aware by now that the COVID nonsense (masking, social distancing, lockdowns, etc.) has nothing to do with health. These measures are used for social control and economic warfare against the lower and middle class (more on that in a future blog post).
Each year in the USA, 659,041 people die from heart disease and 599,601 die from cancer (Source). But we don’t shut the country/world down for that. And why is the government doing nothing to address real epidemics like Autism Spectrum Disorder? Why is there not monumental international coordination to stop 5G in space? Why do we not put an end to real existential threats to life on Earth, such as dangerous forms of artificial electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell phones, WiFi, cell towers, “Smart” meters, etc. ? Why don’t regulatory authorities ban neonicotinoids and glyphosate (Round-Up), which undoubtedly is more dangerous than COVID?
Pandemic? What pandemic?
INTERNATIONAL CONSPIRACY
Interestingly, reports of death certificate fraud and exaggeration of death statistics are not exclusive to the United States. The Corona Investigative Committee is a German based legal team involved in what may become the world’s largest class action lawsuit for fraud. The following legal interviews provide evidence of a global coordination of death statistic inflation, testing fraud, medical malpractice (like inappropriate use of ventilators or putting patients believed to be sick with COVID into nursing homes), homicide/murder investigations from forced vaccination of the elderly, psychological operations in the media (non-scientifically validated concepts like “asymptomatic carriers”, “super spreaders,” and messaging about the necessity to wear masks and not visit our grandparents so that we “don’t kill granny”), etc.:
What is interesting with the Corona Investigative Committee interviews is that you get an international perspective and start seeing the patterns of the conspiracy.
England with Dr. Mike Yeadon, et al
Ireland with Professor Dolores Cahill
Ireland with Professor Dolores Cahill (second interview)
Italy with Dr. Stefano Scoglio
Italy with Dr. Luca Speciani
USA with Pam Popper
USA with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Nepal with Ash Zrl
Israel with Tamir Turgel
Resources
Corona Investigative Committee (Stiftung Corona Ausschuss)
https://corona-ausschuss.de/
The German ACU 2020 – Extra-Parliamentary Corona Commission, comprised of more than 500 German doctors and scientists – has collected the testimonies of numerous leading international scientific experts, thus unmasking the corona crisis as a scandal/fraud on an unprecedented scale. The initiators of ACU 2020, with lead lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, are launching what could be the largest lawsuit ever in the form of a Class Action Lawsuit. This kind of trial enables many victims at the same time to open a case against a third party responsible for mass damage. The criminal organizations responsible for causing an immense global health and economic catastrophe for whole populations must be brought to justice for crimes against humanity. In this 49-minute video by lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, all the facts are made crystal clear: Crimes against humanity
When listening to the English portions of the recordings from the Corona Investigative Committee, it becomes apparent rather quickly that not only is the pandemic a hoax but that it is an internationally coordinated plan with an ulterior motive. (More on this later.) What I recommend is visiting their website video page to view their videos. You can use this horribly formatted page in English to give you an idea of the contents in each video. Because I don’t understand German, I just skip those parts.
TAKE ACTION
Stand for Health Freedom is calling on advocates nationwide to urge Assistant United States Attorneys to impanel a special grand jury to investigate the CDC’s conduct during COVID-19.
Very simply, a grand jury is a group of citizens that has been empowered by law to conduct legal proceedings, investigate potential criminal conduct, and determine whether criminal charges are warranted. Grand juries exist as a means for Americans to exercise oversight over all three branches of government during extraordinary times. With your help, we can convene one and uncover the truth.
Sign this petition urging assistant U.S. attorneys nationwide to convene a special independent grand jury investigation into the CDC’s conduct during COVID-19.
Please be sure to sign — and encourage 10 friends to take action, too.
“Picture for a moment that there were no news reports, no masks, no social distancing, lockdowns or store closings. Would we see that anything was different from all of the past years of our collective experience? Have we seen people dying in the streets? Have we all lost people unexpectedly who were in good health? Are we burying bodies in our backyards? Or is there only the illusion of a pandemic?”
Dr. Andrew Kaufman —> join the resistance
The next post will focus on COVID-19 testing fraud as the next part of this house of cards.
COVID-19 SERIES
Covid-19: What you need to know about the experimental gene injections (Updated: March 5, 2021)
Future posts:
Testing Fraud – How the use of a laboratory genetic magnification tool is being abused to produce a very high rate of false positives that are being used to generate bogus COVID cases and deaths. I’ll also look at the theory of “asymptomatic carriers” and arguments that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never actually been isolated and demonstrated to cause disease in humans.
Lockdowns and COVID Protocols – A medical and scientific evaluation of Covid-19 protocols.
5G/ Electromagnetic Radiation and COVID – what is the the connection? The “internet of bodies” in the burgeoning technocratic global order.
Covid-19 and the Bigger Agenda – getting to the heart of what this is really about. How fear of the virus is being used to manipulate humanity into accepting the stripping of our freedoms and to usher us into a society of total technological control and biomedical tyranny.
Argentina report – the situation in Argentina and the social response to the coronavirus narrative.
As always, I’m interested in dialogue, discussion and debate. After checking my sources and doing your own research, feel free to contribute your thoughts by submitting a post to the bottom of this page.
To get an email update when I post the next blog post, go to my homepage, scroll down to the bottom and enter your email to follow my blog
escape del imperio 